California's Dysfunctional Elections Give Rise to Conspiracy Theories | National Review
nationalreview.com
California's messy election rules are a textbook case of how institutional dysfunction breeds conspiracy thinking — and why procedural legitimacy matters more than outcomes.
Institutional LegitimacyEpistemic ClosureConspiracy Theory FormationProcedural Justice
Theory Briefing
- California's election standards are critiqued as inadequate, creating fertile ground for distrust and conspiratorial narratives among voters.
- Epistemic Closure theory explains how ambiguous systems push partisans toward unfalsifiable explanations when official answers feel incomplete.
- Institutional legitimacy research shows that perceived procedural fairness matters more than results — California's rules may be failing that test.