Supreme Court ruling in Trump v. Slaughter turbocharges presidential power - Salon.com

Theory Briefing

• The ruling is framed as judicial approval of a theory described as the most contentious constitutional idea of recent decades.
• At stake is how much unilateral control a president can exercise — and whether courts can meaningfully check that power.
• The decision's framing as a 'turbocharge' suggests a structural shift, not just a narrow legal win for one administration.
• Debate centers on whether expanded executive authority is a corrective to gridlock or a threat to constitutional balance.