theorypedia
← Back to feed

We do not have a decider in our brain: An IU cognitive neuroscientist challenges theories of ...

newswise.com

An IU neuroscientist's radical new research dismantles the idea of a "decider" in the brain — and it rewrites everything we thought we knew about free will and cognition.

Free WillEmbodied CognitionDual-Process TheoryBounded Rationality
We do not have a decider in our brain: An IU cognitive neuroscientist challenges theories of ...

Theory Briefing

  • An IU cognitive neuroscientist argues there is no discrete decision-making stage separating perception from action in the brain.
  • Both mainstream scientific theories and common-sense intuition treat decisions as an intermediate step — a notion this research directly challenges.
  • The finding destabilizes foundational frameworks around free will, agency, and rational choice by removing the brain's assumed 'decider' role.